A hospital fired an ER doctor for violating its gender-specific dress code. The doctor had continued to wear nail polish, cosmetics and "visible female undergarments" after being warned that his appearance violated hospital standards. He sued, alleging "gender stereotyping" and sex discrimination under state civil rights laws. A lower court tossed out his claim and a state appeals court agreed, saying that different dress codes for men and women don't infer an "inherent characteristic" of one's sex. (Pound v. Lee Memorial Hospital, No. 03-21360, Mich., 2004
- Failure to document disability nixes employee's ADA protection
- Know when to worry about discrimination--and when court will rule 'no harm, no foul'
- Sexual Harassment: Overview
- Title VII: Employees who sue for bias have easier path to victory.
- NYC firefighters' burning issue: Is a Locker 'Private Space'?