Here’s an important reminder that employers aren’t responsible for preventing every ugly workplace incident. Just because someone vandalizes an employee’s property doesn’t mean you will be liable for creating a hostile work environment.
Recent case: Vickie, who is black, claimed that when she transferred to the CSX railroad’s Rocky Mount terminal, it quickly became apparent her new supervisor didn’t want her there. The two had several run-ins over scheduling and directions.
Shortly afterward, Vickie’s car was graffiti-tagged with racial slurs and a mannequin head painted black with a rope around its neck was placed on her back seat.
Vickie sued and a jury said CSX allowed a hostile work environment to exist. But the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the verdict, concluding that Vickie hadn’t linked the vandalism to the supervisor. (Bennett v. CSX Transportation, No. 12-2477, 4th Cir., 2014)
- Warning letter typically isn't an adverse reaction
- Franklin County EMS head sues for bias, FMLA retaliation
- ADA, Ohio disability-Discrimination laws don't cut off other state claims
- Phone propositions yield no sex — and a lost job
- Prepare to justify any adverse employment action affecting members of the military