Here’s an important reminder that employers aren’t responsible for preventing every ugly workplace incident. Just because someone vandalizes an employee’s property doesn’t mean you will be liable for creating a hostile work environment.
Recent case: Vickie, who is black, claimed that when she transferred to the CSX railroad’s Rocky Mount terminal, it quickly became apparent her new supervisor didn’t want her there. The two had several run-ins over scheduling and directions.
Shortly afterward, Vickie’s car was graffiti-tagged with racial slurs and a mannequin head painted black with a rope around its neck was placed on her back seat.
Vickie sued and a jury said CSX allowed a hostile work environment to exist. But the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the verdict, concluding that Vickie hadn’t linked the vandalism to the supervisor. (Bennett v. CSX Transportation, No. 12-2477, 4th Cir., 2014)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- EEOC asks: Is Hernando County a hotbed of age discrimination?
- Can we give paid time off as a bonus to some?
- If fear is a factor, fire threatening employee
- Worker says different punishment shows bias? Your good records will save you in court