Wading into perhaps the most mundane issue it has faced in years, the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 16 ruled that a long-term disability plan’s three-year statute of limitations on claims was “reasonable” and did not violate the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), which governs many.
In 2005, a Walmart employee sought long-term disability benefits, but the Hartford insurance company denied her claim because she waited more than three years to file, as the plan’s terms specified. A district court dismissed the case, the 2nd Circuit affirmed the dismissal and now the Supreme Court has agreed.
The High Court declined to say how long a statute of limitations should be in ERISA cases—merely that the three years required in this case was “reasonable.” The case is Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co. (No. 12-729., U.S. Supreme Court, 2013).
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/37583/reasonable-statutes-of-limitation-ok-under-erisa "