Employers that discriminate against employees who “associate” with disabled individuals face potential liability under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). This kind of discrimination comes in many forms.
For example, association discrimination might include fears that an employee whose partner has HIV may also have become infected through sexual contact or that an employee who has an identical twin with a genetic disease may develop the disability as well.
Distraction discrimination includes discharging an employee because he is somewhat inattentive at work because his spouse or child has a disability that requires his attention, yet not so inattentive that he would need an accommodation (such as different hours) to perform well.
Expense discrimination includes firing or refusing to hire someone because a relative has a serious health problem that could drive up insurance rates or otherwise affect the health care budget.
Recent case: Scott was hired in September and shortly after told his supervisor that in February he was going to donate a kidney to his ailing sister. He asked for leave to undergo surgery and recover. Meanwhile, he got good reviews and never had any complaints about his work. While he did take time off for doctor visits, these always took place during his lunch break.
Late in the year, Scott discovered that a new law would go into effect on Jan. 1, 2011. The law, the Michelle Maykin Memorial Donation Protection Act (DPA), requires employers with 15 or more employees to provide 30 days of paid leave to employees who donate organs. Scott told his supervisor he wanted to take advantage of the paid leave and might also need additional time off if his recovery was lengthy.
Scott was fired two days before the law went into effect, allegedly for.
He sued, alleging disability association discrimination of the expense variety. Scott argued that as soon as his employer learned his leave would be paid, it pre-emptively fired him.
The court said he could take his claim to a jury. If Scott can show he was fired not for poor performance but because helping his disabled sister with a transplant would have cost the company money, he has a case. (Rope v. Auto-Chlor of Washington, No. B242003, Court of Appeal of California, 2nd Appellate District, 2013)
Final note: If you aren’t familiar with the DPA, now is a good time to read up. As more and more Californians begin receiving health insurance coverage through the Affordable Care Act’s insurance exchange or expanded Medicaid programs, there may be an increase in diagnosed illnesses that require transplants. You may therefore see more requests for DPA leave.
DPA requires 30 days of paid leave for organ donations and up to five days of paid leave for bone marrow donations. You can require employees to use up to 15 days of accrued paid time off for organ donations and five days for bone marrow transplants.
During the paid leave, employers must maintain existing group health coverage. Employees continue to accrue paid time off and other benefits as if they had worked without interruption.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/37524/when-employees-help-sick-relatives-beware-disability-association-discrimination "
- Offer several ways to complain of harassment to guard against supervisor inaction
- When punishing employees' use of slurs, equality counts
- Demand fitness exam when performance slips
- 4 employment law lessons from the courts
- Federal government employer? You are liable for interest on back pay if you discriminate