Gov. Jerry Brown recently vetoed two laws affecting employee rights.
A.B. 729 would have granted confidentiality to communications between union agents and represented current or former employees. The status would have been similar to attorney-client privilege.
Brown also vetoed S.B. 655, which would have amended the Fair Employment and Housing Act to allow a plaintiff to prevail on a discrimination or retaliation charge, provided he or she could prove that a protected activity or characteristic was a “substantial motivating factor” for an adverse employment action.
Had the law been enacted, however, it would have limited employee awards to just injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees and costs (including expert witness fees) and a statutory penalty up to $25,000.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Unions are revving up: Here's how to keep them at bay
- When employee sues for discrimination, be prepared to show your processes are solid
- Bosses are first line of defense against unions
- When litigious employee continues to threaten retaliation suit