Gov. Jerry Brown recently vetoed two laws affecting employee rights.
A.B. 729 would have granted confidentiality to communications between union agents and represented current or former employees. The status would have been similar to attorney-client privilege.
Brown also vetoed S.B. 655, which would have amended the Fair Employment and Housing Act to allow a plaintiff to prevail on a discrimination or retaliation charge, provided he or she could prove that a protected activity or characteristic was a “substantial motivating factor” for an adverse employment action.
Had the law been enacted, however, it would have limited employee awards to just injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees and costs (including expert witness fees) and a statutory penalty up to $25,000.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- To prevent retaliation claim, check back within weeks following employee's complaint
- Cut your liability: Suspend and transfer harassers
- Returning from disability leave, can employee dictate the terms of his new job?
- Be patient if worker alleges minor harassment