A Commonwealth Court has ruled that a Ridgway man who was fired for threatening his bosses can’t collect unemployment benefits. The employee had told a co-worker at Clarion Sintered Metals that two supervisors who ordered him to work on a Saturday “didn’t deserve to live.”
The man had worked for the company for 13 years as a tool and die maker.
The “didn’t deserve to live” comment was one of two incidents that led to two warnings and a three-day suspension. Then he upped the ante by stating, “I’m going to come into this place and spray it with bullets.”
By then, the company had had enough and terminated him.
In court to contest denial of unemployment benefits, the man said his comments weren’t threatening. His attorney argued that merely wishing that someone was dead—without any “overt acts of harm”—didn’t constitute a threat.
Note: The employer’s well-documenteddemonstrated to the court that it fired him for “willful misconduct” after several warnings.
- FMLA leave-Takers aren't untouchable, but courts will look closely at timing
- How should we handle partial days off for our salaried business manager?
- New case shows legal risks of 'papering' fired employee's file
- Does your organization need insurance against employee lawsuits?
- When firing follows harassment, watch out! You could be facing a retaliation lawsuit