Absent limited circumstances, a private employer using prison labor probably isn’t required to provide reasonable accommodations under the ADA.
Recent case: William was serving a 10-year sentence for theft and had to perform 40 hours of “hard labor” each week. The prison assigned him to pick tomatoes for a private employer at $2.25 per hour.
While working, William claimed he suffered severe pain in his leg and demanded reasonable accommodations. The employer refused and William sued both the prison and the private company, alleging failure to accommodate.
The court said the company wasn’t a covered employer under the ADA since it didn’t technically employ William. His labor belonged to the prison, since that was part of William’s sentence. (Castle v. Eurofresh, et al., No. 11-1794, 9th Cir., 2013)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Retiring instead of facing discipline doesn't constitute constructive discharge
- Break in employment may cut hostile environment liability
- Who needs to receive anti-harassment training in California?
- Now brewing at Camden café: a sexual harassment suit