Charmaine, a mother of two preschool-age children, applied for an opening in her employer’s executive training program, but wasn’t accepted. Although four of the eight who were selected were women, Charmaine—believing she was more qualified than some who got into the program—filed a charge of discrimination with the EEOC.
The EEOC’s investigation revealed that Charmaine had more experience and betterthan several of the other candidates. Plus, while the employer selected both men and women for the program, the only applicants with preschool-age children were men. As a result, the EEOC investigator determined that Charmaine had been subjected to illegal discrimination on the basis of her sex.
But if half of the applicants selected were women, how could the EEOC have determined that Charmaine was discriminated against on the basis of her sex?
The answer: Because Charmaine was treated less favorably t...(register to read more)
- Good news: Texas Supreme Court says no double claims for sexual harassment
- Rogue manager's alleged harassment could cost McDonald's
- Boeing flying low following EEOC harassment settlements
- Dodge bogus retaliation suits by tracking exact date of every discrimination claim
- Personal liability for wage claims