Here’s a case that should send chills down your spine if you don’t keep meticulous records of every hour worked. A court has allowed a case to proceed based on little more than a worker’s vague allegation that she wasn’t paid overtime for hours in excess of 40 per week.
That leaves it up to the employer to disprove the allegation with solid time records.
Recent case: Joyce lost her job shortly after returning fromto have surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome.
She sued for a long list of perceived wrongs. Her claims included the allegation that over the previous year, she hadn’t been paid for about 310 hours of overtime she claimed she had put in to keep up with the workload. She alleged she had asked her supervisor several times to look into the pay issue.
Joyce did not, however, provide any kind of detailed records of when she worked the overtime hours. The employer asked the court to toss out the case as vague and unspecific.
The court refused. It reasoned that Joyce had alleged a total number of unpaid hours within a specific time frame and that the hours came after she already had worked her standard 40-hour week. That was enough to move the case to the next step, where the employer will have to produce its time records. That’s because the Fair Labor Standards Act requires employers to track hours worked; presumably, therefore, they will always have the records to show who worked when and for how long. (Alston v. Becton, Dickinson & Company, No. 1-12-CV-452, MD NC, 2013)
Final note: Don’t forget that employees may be comparing your time records with theirs, too—using smartphone apps developed by the U.S. Department of Labor.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- When workers must wear special gear, beware lawsuit if you don't pay for 'donning & doffing'
- New restaurant owner finds predecessor cooked the books
- Do OT rules mean end of exempt part-timers?
- Eye care company sees the error of its pay ways