Employees are entitled to reasonable accommodation of their “sincerely held” religious beliefs. Employers face an uphill battle if they want to deny such requests because they doubt the sincerity of their employees’ beliefs. That’s because there’s very little employers can do to get such cases tossed out before they go to trial. End result? Lots of lost time—and lots of attorneys’ fees.
As the following case shows, when it comes to religious beliefs, the employee gets the benefit of the doubt.
Recent case: John Watts was a student in Florida International University’s Master of Social Work program and had to do an internship to graduate. He counseled patients at a state-run psychiatric institution and recommended to a Catholic patient that she look for a bereavement group at church. He was terminated, ostensibly because he recommended she attend church.
Watts sued, alleging the university and the psychiatric institution both interfered with his right to freedom of religious expression. A lower court tossed out the case, but the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated it. The appeals court said cases alleging interference with religious expression will not be dismissed early on in the litigation process, but will go to trial if the person suing alleges interference with a sincerely held religious belief. (Watts v. Florida International University, No. 05-13852, 11th Cir., 2007)
Note: This case involved a state agency, but the concepts apply to all kinds of employers. All an employee has to assert to get to trial is that “he or she holds a sincere religious belief that conflicts with a job requirement” and needs accommodation.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Understanding religious accommodations in Pennsylvania workplaces
- Don't conspire with competitors to freeze workers out of a job
- Appeals court expands free speech protection for employees of government agencies
- Step up to a new high-stakes HR role: Stamping out conspiracies to discriminate