Employees who want to sue for age discrimination have to show that an adverse employment action—such as discharge, demotion, a pay cut or other substantial benefit loss—was connected to their age. Merely being moved to another shift doesn’t qualify.
Recent case: James was over age 60 and worked as a supervisor on the first shift at a chicken processing plant. When business needs changed,and other workforce reassignments meant his skills were needed on the third shift instead of the first. He was informed of the change, but instead of accepting it, he stormed out and then sued, alleging age discrimination.
But the court sided with the employer, noting that a change in the hours one works isn’t an adverse employment action if everything else remains the same. (Darnell v. Tyson Foods, No. 13-1011, 4th Cir., 2013)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/36494/court-shift-change-wont-support-age-bias-claim "
- Long hair nets settlement in Taco Bell religious bias case
- MDHS, state retirees settle age bias complaint
- Before you decide to fire, make sure past evaluations support your rationale
- Cuyahoga pays $100K to settle with gay former employee
- You can offer better benefits to older workers, Supreme Court rules