Employees who want to sue for age discrimination have to show that an adverse employment action—such as discharge, demotion, a pay cut or other substantial benefit loss—was connected to their age. Merely being moved to another shift doesn’t qualify.
Recent case: James was over age 60 and worked as a supervisor on the first shift at a chicken processing plant. When business needs changed,and other workforce reassignments meant his skills were needed on the third shift instead of the first. He was informed of the change, but instead of accepting it, he stormed out and then sued, alleging age discrimination.
But the court sided with the employer, noting that a change in the hours one works isn’t an adverse employment action if everything else remains the same. (Darnell v. Tyson Foods, No. 13-1011, 4th Cir., 2013)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Retaliation can happen even in flimsy harassment case
- Different punishments for breaking same rule? Cite specifics to justify harsher discipline
- OK to suggest retiring in lieu of getting fired: It's not age discrimination
- Courts give employers benefit of doubt: Not all 'unfair' treatment is discrimination