by Christopher C. Murray and Flyn L. Flesher, Esqs., Ogletree Deakins
Since 1982, lawyers have assumed that settling Fair Labor Standards Act () cases out of court isn’t a viable option. That’s because the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that employers and employees cannot settle FLSA claims unless either:
- The settlement is supervised by the U.S. Secretary of Labor, or
- A court enters a stipulated judgment after “scrutinizing the settlement for fairness.”
Most federal district courts follow this principle, routinely holding that out-of-court settlement agreements, to the extent that they purport to waive FLSA claims, are unenforceable. That has made it difficult and expensive for employers to resolve pay issues, even when they realize they made a mistake and want to compensate the employee fairly.
Last year, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals took a more pragmatic approach in Martin v. Spring Break ’83...(register to read more)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Paying nonexempt employees a salary? Be sure to get agreement on hourly rate
- Does San Francisco car wash soak its Latino workers?
- Business interests pan DOL rule doubling overtime salary threshold
- California Labor Department strategy shift benefits workers