by Christopher C. Murray and Flyn L. Flesher, Esqs., Ogletree Deakins
Since 1982, lawyers have assumed that settling Fair Labor Standards Act () cases out of court isn’t a viable option. That’s because the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that employers and employees cannot settle FLSA claims unless either:
- The settlement is supervised by the U.S. Secretary of Labor, or
- A court enters a stipulated judgment after “scrutinizing the settlement for fairness.”
Most federal district courts follow this principle, routinely holding that out-of-court settlement agreements, to the extent that they purport to waive FLSA claims, are unenforceable. That has made it difficult and expensive for employers to resolve pay issues, even when they realize they made a mistake and want to compensate the employee fairly.
Last year, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals took a more pragmatic approach in Martin v. Spring Break ’83...(register to read more)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Ohio sushi chefs to slice up at least $100K in back pay
- Feds cut off future work for North Woods, Minn. contractor
- Settlement after workers (and rabbis) say pay wasn't kosher
- What are wage-and-hour implications of tracking time for telecommuters?