Employers don’t have to be absolutely right before disciplining an employee. They merely have to investigate first.
Recent case: Jenny was a nurse in an elder-care facility. She is Pentecostal and has a cleft palate.
Two co-workers reported that they saw Jenny with her hands between an 80-year old male patient’s legs while the patient had his hands on her breast.
They suspected something wrong was going on. They provided statements to HR, noting that Jenny spent considerable time with the patient behind closed doors. Jenny denied she was abusing the patient and said he had grabbed her.
Still, based on the other employees’ statements, she was fired. She sued, alleging religious and disability discrimination.
Her case was tossed out. The court said the employer could rely on co-worker statements collected during an investigation. (Evance v. Trumann, No. 12-2654, 8th Cir., 2013)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Emotional distress suits: Court says employers can access medical records going back 2 years
- 'Will work for less!' Be wary of reduced-comp pleas from desperate employees
- It pays to hear both sides of the story before a firing
- Before you decide to fire, make sure past job evaluations support your rationale