If you have a poor-performing worker but don’t want to fire him before you have lined up a replacement, make sure you document all the problems—and your efforts to get him up to expectations.
Recent case: Monte was often late clocking in, had multiple unexcused absences and produced numerous defective parts. He was written up for all these but wasn’t fired immediately.
When he was let go, he sued, alleging discrimination. Monte claimed he had met all his employer’s legitimate expectations and therefore must have been fired for some reason other than. He argued if he had been such a bad employee, he would have been fired sooner.
The court dismissed Monte’s case after the employer showed the actual performance record and explained it wanted to give him every opportunity to improve. (Pepper v. Precision Valve, No. 12-2449, 4th Cir., 2013)
- Wear kid gloves with accommodation requests; they are 'protected activity'
- Back-to-basics managers -- Good for the bottom line
- One rule, two employees, two violations: Document why discipline wasn't identical
- A matter of trust: 4 ways to defend against employee disloyalty
- Responding to employee rants: 4 do's and don'ts