Good news: You won’t be held personally liable—and neither will your company—for what you say in response to an EEOC complaint. Statements made in an EEOC investigation are privileged.
Recent case: Raymond, an Iranian-American, claimed he wasn’t promoted from his temporary position at Wells Fargo to a permanent one because of his age and national origin. Raymond also claimed that Wells Fargo should be liable for telling the EEOC that he wasn’t hired because he was hostile, unprofessional and bullying. Those characterizations were untrue, he argued, and therefore defamation.
The court tossed out the claim, reasoning that employers and their representatives have immunity for what they say during an EEOC investigation in order to encourage a frank and open assessment of the alleged facts. (Farzan v. Wells Fargo, et al., No. 12-CIV-1217, SD NY, 2013)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/36018/speak-freely-to-eeoc-its-privileged-communication "
- Employers: 'Keep Out!' Beware overreacting to employees' Facebook, blog postings
- Job applications: What can you ask? How long should you retain them?
- Pay Attention to New Proof-of-Age Requirement for N.Y. Employers
- Court refuses to expand Title VII liability to bosses
- Warn bosses: No retaliation for complaining