Back in December 2011, the operator of a Dairy Queen restaurant in Winston-Salem’s Hanes Mall agreed to settle an EEOC lawsuit involving a teen worker who claimed she was retaliated against for complaining about sexual harassment. The deal called for YS&J Enterprises to pay $17,500 to the teenager and train its managers and supervisors how to spot and stop harassment and retaliation.
A year and a half later, none of those things has happened—no pay to the teen, no training—and the EEOC has decided to up the ante. It filed a civil contempt motion in an attempt to force compliance. A federal judge agreed and ordered a $1,000 per day penalty until the employer honors the settlement agreement’s terms.
Note: Always ask your attorney about your rights and obligations when signing any agreement.
- Where legal trouble lurks: Even unwritten rules must be enforced fairly and consistently
- Lessons from the Courts: June 2009
- Risky environment won't end your duty to reduce danger to staff
- Violence on the job? OK to base punishment on job classification and severity of offense
- Use two-Pronged approach to protect against harassment