If an employee chooses to return to work in a hostile environment, that makes it much harder to successfully sue for harassment.
Recent case: George, who is black, had a long career with Yellow Transportation, spread over two stints. He left the company in 2001 and returned in 2006, working until 2008.
He sued, claiming that he had experienced a hostile work environment for years. He said he regularly saw graffiti featuring racial slurs in the workplace. However, most of the examples he cited occurred during his earlier stint with the company.
The court said the break in employment meant George could not use those earlier examples to prove hostility. That was true even though someone who had worked continuously for the company would have been able to do so. It tossed out George’s case. (Brooks, et al., v. YTI, No. 3:06-CV-1566, ND TX, 2013)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- EEOC issues new guidance on religious garb and grooming
- Courts crack down on serial plaintiffs—and their lawyers
- Another reason to track everything: Passage of time makes it harder for worker to successfully sue
- Place disabled worker on leave while mulling accommodations