Rebuffing the EEOC, a federal judge has ruled that U.S. Steel can randomly test new workers for substance abuse.
The company had argued that the nature of the jobs at its Clairton Works facility, where employees wear extensive protective clothing, makes drug testing necessary. It said it was impossible to determine whether employees were impaired because they are completely covered in protective gear while working.
A former employee had challenged the practice after she tested positive for alcohol and was fired. She claimed the test was a false positive caused by her diabetes. The EEOC sued on her behalf.
The judge sided with U.S. Steel, ruling the testing was appropriate because new employees may not realize the danger of working while impaired.
Note: Have your attorney approve any random drug testing regime (that’s not required by law) to ensure that it complies with the law.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/35353/judge-to-us-steel-random-drug-testing-ok "
- What is the NLRB doing with at-will status?
- Beware expanding EEOC investigation after employee complains about discrimination
- Handling layoffs with workers' comp claims pending
- Beware alternative to Title VII: There's another way to file for race discrimination
- Can we demand certification of violent employee's alleged mental illness?