Employers that do business in several states often have a singlecovering all workers at all locations. If that describes your organization, be careful about how you handle details like arbitration agreements.
Watch for potential problems such as a choice-of-law clause that refers to another state’s statutes even though employees may be working in California. That can cause needless complications later.
Recent case: Hartwell sued, claiming she was unlawfully fired from her California job after requesting a reasonable accommodation for her disabling sleep disorder.
Her former employer, a large international law firm, wanted the case moved to arbitration because Hartwell had signed an arbitration agreement for all claims arising from her employment.
The agreement didn’t specify any particular laws, but included a clause that said the agreement was governed by Massachusetts state contract laws.
A California court, applying Massachusetts contract law, said the agreement was invalid because it didn’t specify which laws it covered. Now the case will go to trial, not arbitration. (Harris v. Bingham McCutchen, No. B240522, Court of Appeal of California, 2nd Appellate District, 2013)
Final note: Sometimes, trying to use arbitration leads to more litigation, not less. That’s particularly true if you operate in several states and want to use a standard arbitration agreement. Before doing so, have an attorney in each state review the agreement. It may be best to have multiple agreements, one for each state.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Simple personality clash is no reason to quit
- Misconduct inquiries: What workers ask & how to answer
- Can transportation firm include class-action waivers in arbitration agreement?
- Clear, open promotion policies key to litigation-Free decisions