Charlotte-based Metro Special Police & Security Services faces EEOC charges that a captain and lieutenant, both men, solicited male security officers for sex, forced them to go to gay bars while on duty and touched the men’s chests and genitals against their will.
In its complaint, the EEOC claims that at least three male officers faced constant sexual harassment, including requests for nude photographs, questions about their sexual preferences and offers of promotions in exchange for sex with their male superiors.
The officers complained to Metro’s CEO, but the company never investigated the harassment allegations. The EEOC claims that several of the men were suspended, demoted or discharged after they filed their internal complaints.
The EEOC sued after mediation efforts failed, seeking back pay, compensatory and punitive damages and injunctive relief.
Note: Under the Civil Rights Act, male-on-male sexual harassment is just as illegal as any other kind of harassment.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/35102/charlotte-security-firm-sued-for-same-sex-harassment "
- Are we vulnerable to reverse discrimination claims because of our 'early out' program?
- Know the law governing background criminal and credit checks
- Don't fear retaliation claim if job changes are minor
- Palm Beach diocese wins grant to fight immigrant bias
- Ex-employees: Gone but not forgotten Courts' broader definition of 'employee' expands your liability