Employers that face lawsuits from employees who act as their own lawyers know it’s hard to get those cases dismissed. Because the employees are representing themselves, judges give them every benefit of the doubt. Even a meritless case can drag on, costing you time and money.
But judges are becoming more sensitive to this problem—and less tolerant of pro se litigants.
Recent case: Monica sued her former employer after filing an EEOC complaint in which she alleged sex discrimination in the form of unequal pay. After the EEOC dismissed her complaint and she filed her federal lawsuit, she added sexual harassment to her list of legal wrongs.
But the court said she couldn’t do that since the EEOC complaint never mentioned harassment. It threw out that claim. (Campos v. IBTX RiskServices, No. 12-CV-00799, WD TX, 2013)
- Walmart must defend against largest wage-and-hour class action in U.S. history
- Can USERRA form the basis of a harassment suit?
- Court: Punishment for helping outsider file harassment complaint isn't retaliation
- Contract worker EPA claims have long shelf lives
- Retiring instead of facing discipline doesn't constitute constructive discharge