Employees’ attorneys have come up with a unique way to interfere with an employer’s right to fire employees. Workers who fear that they’re on the verge of being fired are seeking temporary restraining orders (TRO) to stop the discharge.
Fortunately, not all judges are going along with the ploy.
Recent case: Karen was a psychiatrist who treated prisoners. Due to illness and disability, she took lots of leave. When discussions about reasonable accommodations broke down, she feared she would be fired. She filed a disability discrimination lawsuit—and asked a court to bar her termination pending the outcome of the litigation.
The court refused. It reasoned that Title VII provides for back pay should she win her case. Therefore, Karen wouldn’t have suffered irreparable harm if she had been fired. Since that’s the standard for a TRO, she was out of luck. (Kirby v. Brown, et al., No. S-13-0021, ED CA, 2013)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/34626/court-nixes-temp-restraining-orders-for-bias-complaints "