by Lara C. de Leon, Esq., Ogletree Deakins, Orange County
A recent decision by the California Court of Appeal illustrates just how complicated and costly it can be to discipline an employee who is on protected leave.
In Alamo v. PracticeInformation Corp. (No. B230909, Court of Appeal of California, 2nd District, 2012), a former employee who was fired after returning from sued for .
On appeal, the California Court of Appeal rejected the employer’s arguments that the trial court committed errors when it:
- Instructed the jury that the employee had to prove her pregnancy-related leave was “a motivating reason” for her discharge
- Refused to instruct the jury that the employer could avoid liability under a mixed-motive defense by proving it would have made the same termination decision even if no discriminatory or retaliatory motive existed.
While on leave, an argument
Lorena,...(register to read more)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Tarheel Medical Transport faces PDA suit over forced leave
- Did White Way play dirty when it fired pregnant worker?
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act doesn't require accommodation of pregnancy complications
- Minnesota's own 'equal rights amendment' moves forward