The Minnesota Court of Appeals recently gave employers some certainty regarding the state’s Drug and Alcohol Testing in the Workplace Act (DATWA). But that certainty is a double-edged sword.
The court ruled that the law carries a two-year statute of limitations onclaims. However, it also opened the door for employees to seek punitive damages.
DATWA prohibits employers from terminating someone on the basis of a first confirmed positive drug or alcohol test. The law also requires employers to offer substance-abuse treatment, and prohibits adverse employment action on the basis of a blood-alcohol screen. Employers must offer substance-abuse treatment to employees who fail drug tests and can only terminate them if they refuse to participate in a treatment plan.
Employers have complained that DATWA’s requirement to keep impaired employees in their jobs while in rehabilitation may create aissue in violation of state and federal laws.
Until the Court of Appeals decision, employers did not know how long an employee had to file a wrongful termination claim under DATWA. The appeals court has said two years.
The court also ruled that wrongful termination is an intentional tort under state law, meaning employees could possibly seek punitive damages.
In this case, the employee sued two years and 11 months after being tested. Most likely, he will appeal to the state Supreme Court to permanently settle the statute-of-limitations issue. Whether any party appeals the intentional-tort issue remains to be seen.
Note: Because DATWA is one of the nation’s most restrictive workplace drug testing laws, employers based in other states need specific drug testing procedures in place for their Minnesota employees.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Asked to settle union election challenge, 9th Circuit punts it back to NLRB
- What's the best way to legally limit the length of leaves of absences?
- Misclassification shuts down Charlotte firm's out-of-state job
- Don't let supervisor punish employees who cooperate in investigation