Some jobs require not just bilingual ability, but fluency in a particular language other than English. Hiring for that specific skill isn’t discrimination.
Recent case: Hamida worked as a social worker for the Illinois Department of Human Services. When budget cuts required layoffs, Hamida was among those who lost their jobs.
She sued, alleging that she had been passed over for a job that required foreign language proficiency, and that she spoke two foreign languages, including Farsi and Darai.
The department explained it selected a less-senior social worker who speaks Spanish because it needed a fluent speaker of Spanish, not just any language.
The court threw out the case, citing the irrational argument Hamida put forth—essentially that any second language was good enough for the bilingual position. (Naficy v. Illinois Department of Human Services, No. 11-2144, 7th Cir., 2012)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- New I-9 form plus no-Match letters complicate hiring process
- Female chauffeurs sue Saudi prince, limo company
- Despite recent 8th Circuit ruling, stamp out 'equal-opportunity harassment' to keep harmony
- Despite contract, union members can sue directly