You no doubt know that employers have to provide for meal breaks under California law. But how far do you have to go to force employees to actually take the break? It turns out, not very far.
Recent case: As part of a larger lawsuit, a group of employees claimed that their employer didn’t do enough to ensure they took their meal breaks. The employer argued that by scheduling the breaks and not discouraging employees from eating, it did all it was required to do.
The court agreed. It said that employers don’t have to police meal breaks. They just have to make sure the time off is available and that workers perform no work during breaks. The law requires nothing more. (Muldrow v. Surrex Solutions, No. D057955, Court of Appeal of California, 4th Appellate District, 2012)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/33311/you-dont-have-to-force-workers-to-take-meal-breaks "
- UI benefits due unless you prove independent contractor status
- Harassment: State LAD covers outside business relationships, too
- ACA regs define minimum value, clarify role of wellness programs
- Obama to order higher minimum wage for fed contractor employees
- Use tip credit for some pay? Beware requiring 'substantial' work that doesn't generate tips