Employers that promptly investigate sexual harassment claims aren’t liable for co-worker harassment.
Recent case: Dayna, a corrections officer at a prison, was working in a control room when a male corrections officer entered. He began massaging her shoulders and rubbing against her. When he began making moaning noises, she pushed him away. Seconds later, he ejaculated on her. Upset, she got a plastic bag to preserve the evidence. Then she filed a sexual harassment complaint.
Two investigations ensued, each concluding that the activity was consensual and that both Dayna and the man should be terminated. Dayna sued, alleging sexual harassment.
She lost the case—even though the court thought it strange that someone would preserve semen from a consensual incident. What mattered was that the employer took her complaint seriously and investigated. (Newton v. Ohio, No. 11-3681, 6th Cir., 2012)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/33199/prompt-investigation-cuts-co-worker-harassment-liability "
- Pair of cases shows how you can legally use arbitration, but standards are high
- Internal wage-and-hour complaints don't count as 'testimony' in FLSA retaliation cases
- EEOC to N.C. janitorial firm: Clean up this debt!
- Goldsboro builder settles bias case with Adventists
- Contract will still stick, even if employee fails to read it