by Thomas G. Eron, Esq., Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse
A recent decision by New York’s highest court highlights the value of spelling out the terms of employment in a written offer letter.
In Ryan v. Kellogg Partners Institutional Services (No. 37, NY Court of Appeals, 2012), the New York Court of Appeals upheld an award of $380,000 for an unpaid wage claim and attorneys’ fees, principally because the jury believed the plaintiff’s testimony that he was promised a $175,000 bonus by the defendant’s managing partner. That was despite the managing partner’s testimony that he made no such promise.
Neither Kellogg Partners’ employment-at-will policy and disclaimers, nor the Statute of Frauds provided a defense to the claim.
A properly drafted employment offer letter, which was missing here, would have made all the difference in the result.
A binding promise?
Daniel Ryan testified that he was recruited to work as the ch...(register to read more)
- Follow 5 steps to make sure new GINA law doesn't trip you up
- UPS, contractors owe $1.2 million to misclassified janitors
- Your dollars at risk: 6 ways to protect yourself from personal liability
- FLSA and Georgia law: Figuring overtime pay for commission employees
- Houston manufacturer settles bias lawsuit with 78 employees