Ill-chosen words can haunt incautious supervisors. Example: Using the term “slacker” to describe someone who misses lots of work. Here’s why: Disparaging comments may be proof that the employer retaliated against an employee for taking too much leave.
Recent case: Craig was a Lee County EMT. He took considerablefor himself and to care for his parents. The county routinely approved his leave requests.
Then, after six months, he was terminated for arriving late to an emergency call. He sued, alleging retaliation.
As evidence, he introduced testimony from his union representative. The rep recalled that he told several employees thathad Craig on its “radar” for taking too much time off.
The rep also testified that supervisors referred to employees withproblems as “slackers.”
Craig also pointed out that another EMT who was also late for a call was merely suspended. She hadn’t used FMLA leave—and in her case, the patient actually died, perhaps because of the delay.
That was enough for the court to let Craig’s case proceed. A jury will now decide whether he was really punished for being a late or for taking too much FMLA leave. (Cotora v. Lee County, No. 2:10-CV-775, MD FL, 2012)
- Suspect leave abuse? Consider surveillance to catch those trying to game FMLA system
- OK to cut position of worker on FMLA leave--if you can prove FMLA status didn't affect decision
- Can a former employee demand that we pay her for unused vacation and sick leave?
- Beware disciplining employees for FMLA-related tardiness
- Good news: Supreme Court eases path from N.C. to federal court