Employees undergoing normal pregnancies don’t have an ADA claim.
Recent case: Anamaria worked for Target and was fired during the last phases of a pregnancy, allegedly for missing too much work. She sued, alleging bothunder Title VII and disability discrimination under the ADA.
The court tossed out her ADA claim. It reasoned that the(PDA) was enacted before the ADA. If Congress had wanted to add pregnancy as an ADA disability, it would have done so explicitly. It didn’t. That’s presumably because it believed the PDA already offered enough protection. (Penaloza v. Target, No. 8:11-CV-33, MD FL, 2012)
Final note: Anamaria hadn’t worked for Target long enough to qualify for. She was fired and would have given birth before ever becoming eligible.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/32895/normal-pregnancy-isnt-an-ada-covered-disability "
- Hiring during the downturn? Stacks of résumés are no excuse for sloppy practices
- Oral settlement agreement may be binding even if the specifics are unclear
- Beware double damages when sued under EPA
- Workplace bias claims by Muslims on the rise
- Avoid new legal risk: Train supervisors to stamp out hostile work environment retaliation