No one tolerates the usual racial and ethnic slurs. But what about novel phrases that aren’t in the common lexicon? Can those be the basis for a racially hostile work environment claim? Not if the employee claiming she was slurred has nothing but a personal belief to back up her claim.
Recent case: Dianna, who is black, lost her job with a state agency and sued. Among her claims was that she had worked in a racially hostile environment because some co-workers used the phrase “shoot a monkey” in her presence. She said it was racially charged.
The agency argued that the phrase was just a substitute for profanity and wasn’t racial at all. Dianna had nothing to back up her personal beliefs about the phrase. The case was dismissed. (Jones v. Louisiana Department of Health, No. 11-30979, 5th Cir., 2012)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/32475/is-it-a-slur-or-a-misinterpretation "
- Wear kid gloves with accommodation requests; they are 'protected activity'
- Court: Employee must tie claims to protected status to win hostile environment case
- Track older workers' training opportunities
- New president, new Congress: 5 new employment laws could reshape HR
- Sexual harassment settlement not part of the public record