by Hope A. Comisky, Esq., and Fatima Bhuriwala, Pepper Hamilton, LLP, Philadelphia
An intriguing discrimination case in New Jersey raises complicated issues that Pennsylvania courts may one day have to address.
In Cowher v. Carson & Roberts (A-4014-10T1, N.J. Super., 2012) Myron Cowher sued because his supervisors frequently directed anti-Semitic slurs toward him. But Cowher is not Jewish, so the trial court dismissed his religious harassment claim, holding that New Jersey law doesn’t recognize a discrimination claim based on perceived membership in such a protected class.
The New Jersey Appellate Division disagreed. It held that the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination prohibits discrimination based on protected characteristics even if the harassment victim did not possess, but was perceived to possess, the protected characteristic.
Note: Two seminal federal anti-discrimination statutes—Title VII and the ADA—prohibit work...(register to read more)
- Lessons from the Courts: June 2009
- Employment testing and discrimination in the post-Ricci era
- Beware asking applicants about medical histories before making job offer
- When salaries differ within job classification, be prepared to offer data explaining why
- Don't 'call in sick' to avoid employment-tax obligation