by Hope A. Comisky, Esq., and Fatima Bhuriwala, Pepper Hamilton, LLP, Philadelphia
An intriguing discrimination case in New Jersey raises complicated issues that Pennsylvania courts may one day have to address.
In Cowher v. Carson & Roberts (A-4014-10T1, N.J. Super., 2012) Myron Cowher sued because his supervisors frequently directed anti-Semitic slurs toward him. But Cowher is not Jewish, so the trial court dismissed his religious harassment claim, holding that New Jersey law doesn’t recognize a discrimination claim based on perceived membership in such a protected class.
The New Jersey Appellate Division disagreed. It held that the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination prohibits discrimination based on protected characteristics even if the harassment victim did not possess, but was perceived to possess, the protected characteristic.
Note: Two seminal federal anti-discrimination statutes—Title VII and the ADA—prohibit work...(register to read more)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Collective bargaining terms mean no unemployment comp for pregnant employees
- Instant response to harassment complaint cuts liability risk
- 'Last straw' needn't be egregious to justify firing
- Central Valley fast food firm forks over $100K for bias