There’s no collecting attorneys’ fees from the EEOC in mid-litigation. A court said that it must wait until a case ends.
Recent case: The EEOC sued U.S. Steel and several other entities, alleging they wrongly forced medical examinations on disabled employees without a job-related reason that was consistent with business necessity.
U.S. Steel countered that the claim was frivolous and had been omitted from earlier EEOC conciliation efforts. In effect, it argued that it had been surprised at the charges, never had a chance to settle them in conciliation and now had to endure long and expensive litigation. It wanted the EEOC to pay almost $100,000 in legal fees and costs.
The court said it was too early to consider whether the employer was due the money. (EEOC v. U.S. Steel, et al., No. 10-1284, WD PA, 2012)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/32405/eeoc-wont-pay-legal-costs-until-case-runs-its-course "
- Employers: 'Keep Out!' Beware overreacting to employees' Facebook, blog postings
- Understanding religious accommodations in Ohio workplaces
- USERRA doesn't require veteran's preference
- Clarify if (and when) employees can drive company car for personal use
- Employee/contractor question hinges on employer control