A federal court has said it will soon decide a case that may makeillegal in North Carolina. At issue is whether North Carolina employers are liable for wrongful discharge if they fire a pregnant woman from her at-will job.
Recent case: Daria, a Wake Forest University employee, got great reviews until she announced her pregnancy. Within days, her supervisor began criticizing her work, and soon she was fired.
She sued, alleging she had been wrongfully fired in violation of public policy.
Wake Forest tried to get the case dismissed, arguing Daria was an at-will employee who could be fired for any legal reason. It claimed that, because no North Carolina law prohibits discrimination against pregnant women, it was within its rights to fire an at-will employee.
The federal court hearing the case said it will ponder whether North Carolina law protects pregnant women from discrimination.
At the heart of the case is this question: Did a federal law protecting women from pregnancy discrimination that was enacted a year after North Carolina banned sex discrimination (but not pregnancy discrimination) have the effect of changing North Carolina law? (Leonard v. Wake Forest University, No. 1:11-CV-307, MD NC, 2012)
Note: Suing under state law offers employees the possibility of a much bigger payday. Federal law caps damage awards. But if an employee wins a wrongful-termination-in-violation-of-public-policy case under state law, the potential payout is unlimited.
- Can we make employee cover up her tattoos?
- Religious accommodations: Must you let employee wear a nose ring?
- FMLA isn't 'discipline shield': Fire for unrelated actions
- Easy way to stop most harassment claims: Respond ASAP when employee first complains
- Remedy for discrimination can include neutral references and contact reporting