TheAct ( ) protects employees against retaliation for taking . But a recent court decision makes clear that employees retain these rights only if they're actually eligible to take FMLA leave. That holds true even if the employee suffers an "adverse action," such as a firing or demotion.
To be eligible for FMLA leave, employees must work for the same employer for at least 12 months and clock at least 1,250 hours during the 12 months leading up to the leave.
Recent case: Brandi Walker began her teaching job on Aug. 9. When she became pregnant a couple months later, Walker informally told her principal that she wanted to takestarting Aug. 2 of the next year, her due date.
After the school board decided not to renew her contract, Walker sued, claiming the action was in retaliation for her leave request. But the court threw out Walker's lawsuit, saying her leave request wasn't protected by the FMLA's anti-retaliation provision.
Reason: She hadn't been on staff for the required 12 months when she requested the leave, nor would she be FMLA-eligible by the time of her expected due date. (Walker v. Elmore Cty Bd. of Education, No. 02-16509, 11th Cir., 2004)
Final note: The court made clear that the FMLA doesn't protect employees who take leave at a time when they're not eligible. But the court left unanswered whether the law protects a pre-eligibility request for post-eligibility leave.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Will Maryland court ruling stop 'Wal-Mart health care' laws in other states?
- Tell supervisors: No matter the inconvenience, never interfere with employees' FMLA rights
- Fired for death threats? No unemployment for you!
- Monitoring the virtual water cooler: Facebook and beyond