When employees need, they are entitled to take time off free from work responsibilities. Of course, that may leave some tasks undone. Some employees, especially those in positions, may feel obliged to work additional hours, or may sometimes forgo taking leave.
As long as there’s no employer pressure to get the work done, that extra work won’t support an-interference lawsuit.
Recent case: Susan managed a retail store and was responsible for scheduling subordinates, including assistant managers. When her husband developed cancer, she requested intermittentto take him to biweekly chemotherapy sessions. Her request was approved.
Susan was fired after a deposit she said she had made went missing. She sued, alleging, among other claims, that the retailer had interfered with herleave rights.
She claimed that because she had so much work do, she frequently came in on chemo days, working from early morning until her husband’s appointment and then returning at night to close the store.
The employer countered that Susan could have used her supervisory authority to schedule assistant managers around her intermittent FMLA leave. It said it wasn’t responsible for her failing to do so, or for feeling compelled to work extra hours. The court agreed and tossed out the case. (Sizemore v. Dolgencorp of Texas, No. 4:10-CV-650, ED TX, 2012)
Final note: Susan also claimed she was unfairly fired for losing the deposit. She claimed that two male managers who lost deposits weren’t fired—evidence, she said, of discrimination. But in one case, the bank found the deposit and accepted blame. In the other, the manager was fired.
- Firing worker during FMLA leave: possibly legal, but usually unwise
- Battle of the benefits: PTO bank may calm parent vs. nonparent tension
- Consider ADA before applying tardiness rules
- State Pays Out Nearly $4 Million After Firing at-Will Employee
- Truck driver files race suit against Alice energy company