Not every hiring preference is evidence of discrimination. You can limit the number of applicants by setting parameters—such as considering current employees first.
Recent case: Warren, who is black, applied for a job with the U.S. Forest Service. There were two application avenues: one for current and former federal employees and another for everyone else. Warren fell into the second category.
The Forest Service hired a white woman who had experience as a federal employee. Warren sued, alleging race and sex discrimination.
The 3rd Circuit tossed out his lawsuit. It decided that the Forest Service was free to set up two applicant pools. It could then select an applicant from whichever pool it chose. (Gladden v. Vilsack, No. 11-3001, 3rd Cir., 2012)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/31688/hiring-preferences-ok-not-evidence-of-discrimination "
- When the riffed 'group' is just one worker, expect a lawsuit
- Will election result affect hiring? It depends on your industry
- Act fast when chronic complainer has real gripe
- Muslim DA's bias suit against Youngstown moves on
- Hey, boss, you better call HR! Warn managers against trying to resolve complaints informally