Some employees think that just because they are on, they can’t be fired. That’s just not true.
An employer that can show it would have terminated an employee for lack of work or another business reason can do so duringleave. However, it must be able to offer clear, documented proof showing the move wasn’t related to the leave.
You can do that with economic data showing the employee was slated for a reduction in force. You can also show that the employee was terminated because of wrongdoing.
Recent case: Erica worked for Northwest Home Care, a health-services provider, as a manager. Subordinates began complaining about Erica’s professionalism and she was moved to another position shortly before she began a scheduled.
While out on FMLA leave, Erica was informed that she was being terminated because demand had slacked off.
She sued, alleging interference with her. She then asked the court to enter judgment on her behalf, reasoning that her former employer clearly violated the law by terminating her during leave.
The court said things weren’t that clear-cut. Northwest Home Care had proof that it cut Erica either foror for lack of work.
A jury will have to decide whether that was the real reason, or that Erica was terminated because she took FMLA leave. (Selshtut v. Northwest Home Care, No. 11-C-1312, ND IL, 2012)
- Leave by any other name is still FMLA leave
- Limping employee not ensured NJLAD protection
- You're risking FMLA lawsuit if call-in rules don't allow flexibility in emergencies
- Leave as a disability accommodation: Are your policies compliant?
- OK to fire worker who took FMLA leave--as long as reason doesn't involve FMLA