What can you do if an employee presents you with medical restrictions that limit his ability to perform essential functions of his job? If it’s clear he can’t actually do the job, you can place him on leave.
Recent case: Dale Shepard worked for UPS as a union employee. He developed leukemia, a condition that meant he could no longer lift 70 pounds, as his job required. UPS placed him on leave because it could not transfer him to an office job under the collective-bargaining agreement.
Shepard sued, alleging that by being placed on leave, he was regarded as disabled and discriminated against.
The court disagreed. It pointed out that UPS’ leave placement was a reasonable response to Shepard’s medical restrictions, given the collective bargaining agreement in place. (Shepard v. UPS, No. 11-11976, 11th Cir., 2012)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Raleigh KFC agrees to settle EEOC harassment lawsuit
- Bias plaintiffs must suffer discrimination themselves
- Quick action cuts sexual harassment liability
- Supervisor deserves termination? Fire away--even if he's a member of a protected class