What can you do if an employee presents you with medical restrictions that limit his ability to perform essential functions of his job? If it’s clear he can’t actually do the job, you can place him on leave.
Recent case: Dale Shepard worked for UPS as a union employee. He developed leukemia, a condition that meant he could no longer lift 70 pounds, as his job required. UPS placed him on leave because it could not transfer him to an office job under the collective-bargaining agreement.
Shepard sued, alleging that by being placed on leave, he was regarded as disabled and discriminated against.
The court disagreed. It pointed out that UPS’ leave placement was a reasonable response to Shepard’s medical restrictions, given the collective bargaining agreement in place. (Shepard v. UPS, No. 11-11976, 11th Cir., 2012)
- Court warns against bending the rules when hiring
- Big Supreme Court ruling gives employees the green light to sue over 401(k) losses
- Who gets the promotion? 6 steps to smart and legal decisions
- Family-Responsibility discrimination: A growing trend
- Supreme Court rejects EEOC's broad definition of 'supervisor'