by Christopher T. Kurtz and Subhash Viswanathan, Esqs., Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC
A state appeals court has reversed a lower court ruling and held that the city of Yonkers’ refusal to reimburse new employees for their statutorily required Tier V retirement plan contributions was not subject to arbitration.
Our firm—Bond, Schoeneck & King—represented the city of Yonkers in the litigation.
Retirement plan at issue
The dispute arose in connection with the 2009 enactment of Article 22 of New York’s Retirement and Social Security Law (Tier V). Among other changes, Tier V provides that those who join the Police and Fire Retirement System (PFRS) on or after Jan. 10, 2010, must “contribute 3% of their salary towards the ... retirement [plan] in which they are enrolled.”
Before enactment of Tier V, the city and the Yonkers Firefighters union were parties to a collective-bargaining agreement that expired on June 30, 2009. Like man...(register to read more)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Whistle-blower claims retaliation by Bexar constable's office
- Don't lose your at-will right by guaranteeing a job for life
- Establish an employee policy on responding to shoplifters--and be consistent in enforcement
- Lower retirement pay doesn't excuse late discrimination filing