Some employees think that throwing around a few unfounded allegations makes them whistle-blowers. They assume that by reporting what they think is illegal activity, they gain job protection.
That’s not always true. If the alleged misconduct isn’t reported in good faith, there’s no protection.
Recent case: Phyllis Nairn worked as a teacher for a Texas school district. She complained tothat her boss was sexually harassing another teacher. The district investigated and discovered that the conduct Nairn objected to consisted of a hug that the recipient didn’t find offensive.
Nairn’s contract wasn’t renewed and she sued, alleging retaliation for whistle-blowing.
The court tossed out her claim, reasoning that Nairn hadn’t acted in good faith when she complained. (Nairn v. Killeen Independent School District, No. 08-10-00303, Court of Appeal of Texas, 8th District, 2012)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Employees who sue and lose are now more likely liable for court costs
- Press 'send' for liability: The legal risk of misdirected e-mail
- Beware justifying hiring or promotion with criteria that don't appear in job description
- Use peer-Review process to assess subjective qualities—And justify discipline