Some employees act as their own lawyers, something that can put employers at a disadvantage. That’s because courts bend over backward to make sure an unrepresented litigant gets his day in court.
Recent case: Bakarr Bangura sued his former employer over alleged discrimination based on his Senegalese national origin. Using a blank federal form provided to pro se litigants, he checked only the box for suing under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA). His form didn’t make any federal law claims.
The employer got the case dismissed because Bangura hadn’t filed a state discrimination agency complaint before he sued.
But he appealed, and the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. It ordered a trial court to reconsider whether Bangura has a Title VII claim even though he didn’t check that box. (Bangura v. Elwyn, No. 11-4235, 3rd Cir., 2012)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Always investigate discrimination complaints to ferret out boss bias, prevent retaliation
- Something's fishy in aftermath of Tampa discrimination trial
- Reacting to an Office Affair? Don't Forget the 'Fair' Part
- Change in grooming policy triggers religious bias suit