New Jersey’s Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), which protects employees from retaliation for whistle-blowing, has an extensive reach. New Jersey companies with operations or facilities in foreign countries can find themselves being sued in-state, even if the alleged whistle-blowers work overseas.
Recent case: Pharmaceutical giant Schering-Plough, with corporate offices in New Jersey, also operates a subsidiary in Argentina.
That’s where Carlos Aguerre and other employees told their supervisors about alleged “widespread unethical
and illegal marketing and sales practices” involving anti-infective and anti-cancer products. They claimed that
following their revelations, the company forced them to sign termination agreements in Argentina. After complying, the former employees alleged Schering-Plough and its foreign subsidiary actively tried to block their re-employment.
The men sued in the New Jersey courts, alleging that their forced agreements were invalid and that the subsidiary fired them in retaliation for whistle-blowing.
Now the New Jersey Superior Court has decided they should have a chance to make their case — in New Jersey. The court reasoned that CEPA applies to New Jersey companies, even if the alleged whistle-blowing involved foreign subsidiaries and occurred outside the country. (Aguerre, et al., v. Schering-Plough, et al., A-1940-04T2, Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, 2007)
- 4-pronged cane sparks an ADA lawsuit
- Government whistle-blowing is protected speech--unless delivered in insubordinate manner
- What's the New Jersey law on paydays?
- What should we do? Employee wants a transfer as a reasonable accommodation
- With arbitration under attack, consider right-to-jury-trial waivers