by Abigail Crouse, Esq.
In January, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) held that employers may not require employees to sign arbitration agreements that waive their rights to bring class or collective actions.
In a 2-0 decision, the board examined a “Mutual Arbitration Agreement” (MAA) that home builder D.R. Horton Inc., required employees to sign as a condition of employment. The agreement mandated resolution of all employment disputes through arbitration and prohibited the arbitrator from hearing any consolidated, class or collective claims.
As a result, employees who signed the MAA were prohibited from bringing any class or collective actions, either in court and before an arbitrator. (D.R. Horton, Inc., Case 12-CA-25764, Jan. 3, 2012)
The NLRB reasoned that such an agreement infringes on employees’ rights to engage in “concerted activities” under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).
While th...(register to read more)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Volunteerism can benefit your bottom line
- Cincinnati union leader faces jail time, fines for fraud
- Minnesota State Supreme Court extends time for whistle-blowers to file
- Case appears headed for court? See if union contract requires arbitration instead