by Abigail Crouse, Esq.
In January, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) held that employers may not require employees to sign arbitration agreements that waive their rights to bring class or collective actions.
In a 2-0 decision, the board examined a “Mutual Arbitration Agreement” (MAA) that home builder D.R. Horton Inc., required employees to sign as a condition of employment. The agreement mandated resolution of all employment disputes through arbitration and prohibited the arbitrator from hearing any consolidated, class or collective claims.
As a result, employees who signed the MAA were prohibited from bringing any class or collective actions, either in court and before an arbitrator. (D.R. Horton, Inc., Case 12-CA-25764, Jan. 3, 2012)
The NLRB reasoned that such an agreement infringes on employees’ rights to engage in “concerted activities” under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).
While th...(register to read more)
- Say no to accommodations if 'disability' barely scratches the surface of credibility
- Out of sight shouldn't be out of mind: Monitor remote facilities for signs of harassment
- What do Illinois employers need to know about Indiana's new right-to-work law?
- NLRB requires Oakland employer to release confidential docs
- Know whether you must post an injury/illness summary