If a reasonable person wouldn’t find mild, isolated comments out of line, an overly sensitive employee will have a hard time arguing that they were offensive enough to warrant a lawsuit.
Recent case: Marilyn Sessions, who is black, claimed that the black superintendent of the school system where she worked, twice made statements that Sessions found racially offensive.
During the first incident, Sessions was at her desk speaking with another black teacher when the superintendent entered the room. The superintendent asked how Sessions took care of her hair.
When Sessions replied that she merely washed and dried it, the superintendent said, “Oh, you have that good hair.”
The second incident occurred during a meeting. The superintendent suggested that as a team-building exercise, everyone bring in a baby picture and have others try to pick out who was whom. She added that they might need to plant some fake photos since “some of us have more melanin in our skin than others.” Sessions filed a complaint.
But when Sessions was later terminated for, she filed an EEOC lawsuit, alleging retaliation. The trial court tossed out her case, and she appealed.
The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to reinstate the lawsuit, reasoning that Sessions hadn’t engaged in protected activity and therefore couldn’t have been retaliated against. The court said no reasonable person would have seen the two isolated comments as racially hostile. (Sessions v. Montgomery County, No. 10-1827, 4th Cir., 2012)
- What does broad new definition of 'Retaliation' mean to you?
- Beware age discrimination risk when offering promotions
- Job applications: what to include, what to leave out
- Honesty clause on application can stop frivolous lawsuits
- No matter how implausible, you must investigate every sexual harassment complaint