The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled for the first time on an importantquestion, providing greater protection for employees who are not yet eligible for but who request leave that will start once they become eligible. The court said employees who haven’t yet worked for their employer for one year and 1,250 hours can’t be terminated for requesting later leave.
Recent case: Kathryn Pereda had worked for her employer 11 months when she told her boss she was pregnant and would take FMLA leave once her child was born.
Pereda was fired before she became FMLA-eligible—a move her resulting lawsuit said was punishment for requesting FMLA leave. A trial court dismissed her case, reasoning that she wasn’t eligible for leave when she made the request and therefore had no.
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed. It reasoned that, as long as the employee would be eligible on the requested day, she was protected from retaliation for requesting leave early. (Pereda v. Brookdale Senior Living Communities, No. 10-14723, 11th Cir., 2012)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Remind bosses: Handle FMLA requests stoically, even if they'll cause scheduling problems
- Check RIF list to make sure it doesn't show bias against employees who took FMLA leave
- Obesity equals higher absenteeism, workers' comp costs
- EEOC sues modeling school over firing of pregnant director