by Harold P. Coxson Jr., Esq.
Last year ended and 2012 began with a flurry of activity from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Between controversial appointments to the board and action on two new rules concerning organized labor, the NLRB has given employers much to watch.
Controversial NLRB appointments
In a challenge to Congressional confirmation authority, President Obama announced on Jan. 4—during the “intersession” period between the first and second sessions of Congress—his intent to make the recess appointments of Democrats Richard Griffin and Sharon Block and Republican Terence Flynn as members of the NLRB.
The three recess appointees will join confirmed Chairman Mark Pearce (a Democrat) and Brian Hayes, who is a Republican.
Normally, NLRB members must be confirmed by the Senate. To block recess appointments without Senate confirmation, Republicans had attempted to refuse to recess, holding “pro forma” sessions over the holidays.
The recess appointments will last until the adjournment of the next session of Congress, after the 2012 elections.
Griffin was the general counsel of the International Union of Operating Engineers. Block was the Obama administration’s Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Congressional Affairs. Flynn was formerly chief counsel to the NLRB chair and later a member of the NLRB’s staff.
The Becker backdrop
The most recent recess appointments will continue the controversy begun by the recess appointment of NLRB member Craig Becker two years ago.
Before nominating the current recess appointees, Obama in December withdrew his nomination of Becker for another term. Becker formerly served as associate general counsel to the AFL-CIO and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). His confirmation was denied following a contentious Senate committee hearing in which his controversial writings in support of pro-unionreforms were highlighted.
Becker had written that many labor reforms could be achieved by the NLRB itself, without involving Congress.
On Dec. 19, all 47 Republican Senators wrote to Obama warning against repeating the controversy that surrounded Becker’s recess appointment in 2010. They warned him not to make any intersession recess appointments of unconfirmed members to the NLRB.
They said doing so would “set a dangerous precedent that would most certainly be exploited in future cases to further marginalize the Senate’s role in confirming nominees” and that such a maneuver “could needlessly provoke a constitutional conflict between the Senate and the White House.”
Obama’s most recent recess appointments only exacerbate the already controversial political actions that have engulfed the NLRB. The appointments are likely to continue the pro-union legacy left by Becker, and almost certainly will trigger another battle with Congress—which will challenge the appointments, and the NLRB itself—in an election year.
Author: Harold P. Coxson Jr. is a shareholder in Ogletree Deakins’ Washington, D.C., office. Contact him at (202) 887-0855.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/29900/nlrb-continues-with-controversial-moves-and-appointments "
- Don't drag feet on accommodation; delay can equal discrimination
- Must we turn over personnel records that might compromise an investigation?
- New govt. guidance on protecting staff from avian flu
- Even Lateral Transfer Can Be Declared 'Illegal Retaliation'
- Employers don't always have to be right, just honest