Some employees claim they have asthma and allergies that are exacerbated by common workplace smells. That doesn’t mean, however, that employers have to create an allergen-free environment.
Often, such employees won’t be considered disabled. Thus, they’re not entitled to accommodations.
Recent case: Tina Milton worked in a prison and complained that dust, cleaning odors and perfumes caused asthma and allergy attacks. She asked for a contamination-free workplace and went out on medical leave. When the prison couldn’t find an appropriate job or work space, it terminated Milton when her leave ended. She sued, alleging ADA violations.
The court threw out her case, reasoning that Milton wasn’t disabled just because she sometimes was short of breath and had to cough. (Milton v. Texas, No. 11-10-303, SD TX, 2011)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Right to have a witness during discipline
- Court refuses to sidestep employee notification of pending class-action lawsuit
- Oral settlement agreement may be binding even if the specifics are unclear
- Employers win Nassar battle, but retaliation war continues