In an opinion welcomed by multistate employers with employees and operations in California, the California Court of Appeal recently ruled that binding arbitration mandated by an arbitration agreement could determine a former employee’s wage claims for an unpaid profit-sharing bonus and severance pay.
The Court of Appeal held that Section 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) pre-empts an employee’s right
to a judicial forum for the employee’s unpaid wage claims under California Labor Code Section 229. The FAA mandates enforcement of arbitration clauses in contracts involving interstate commerce. The case is Giuliano v. Inland Empire Personnel, Inc., No. B190771, California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate District, 2007.
In 2003, James Giuliano moved from Indiana to California to become executive vice president and chief financial officer of Inland Empire Personnel. Giuliano signed an employment contract contain...(register to read more)
- Employee sued and now she's back at work? Don't walk on eggshells for fear of retaliation
- Baytown falls victim to growing age bias lawsuit trend
- You can ban employee smoking, but can you ban smokers?
- Asking worker to stay can counter constructive discharge
- Firing worker during FMLA leave: possibly legal, but usually unwise