Minneapolis-based grocery chain Supervalu faces a lawsuit from a former employee at a distribution center in Pennsylvania.
Long-time employee Terri Wolfinger claims the company changed the lifting requirements in her job description to prevent her from returning to work after she injured her arm. Wolfinger worked as a purchaser. The position had no weight-lifting requirements until she took leave to tend to her injury.
Then, she claims, the company imposed an 81-pound lifting requirement, even though the job involved little to no actual lifting. Wolfinger’s doctor restricted her from lifting anything more than 50 pounds. The company refused to accommodate her and terminated her.
Wolfinger alleges that Supervalu then reduced the lifting requirement to 35 pounds because the person they chose to replace her had a medical lifting restriction.
Wolfinger, who worked for the company from 1979 until last April, seeks damages under the ADA.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Look for hiring trends that could signal bias—you might just avoid a huge jury award
- School's out for summer! But the FMLA doesn't cover day care
- Worker claims negligent supervision caused harassment? She must sue under Title VII
- Anyone can challenge medical inquiries, not just disabled workers